Common Sense Ethics
Follow Common Sense Ethics:
  • Blog
  • About
  • Books & Book Reviews
  • Parenting Resources
  • Personal Growth Resources
  • Contact Me

Why Is Politics so Divisive?

1/26/2019

5 Comments

 
Picture
"Socrates was about getting to the bottom of an argument. About not giving up on it. About facing his own ignorance and confronting his own prejudices. Most of all, he was about having a real conversation." - Classicist Mary Beard

I'm just going to come out and say it. Contemporary politics is unbearable, petty and divisive. So how did things get this way? Why has the political sphere become so divsive in recent years? I'll take a stab answering that question here.

I am optimistic that there will be a return to a more Socratic way of doing things; a return to some sembalance of civility and reason. Perhaps if we are willing to look critically at why things have gotten so divisive, we may find some solutions to bring the sanity back to politics.


1. The Ends Justify The Means

When politics is perceived as a zero sum game, (in which a gain for one side entails a corresponding loss for the other side) then there is no benefit to be gained from civility, compromise, statesmanship, or bi-partisanship. 

This translates to winning at any cost for the politicians themselves, and it is probably why we see more willingness to engage in election fraud, candidate disenfranchisement, debate rigging, incivility, smear campaigns and so forth that the so-called left and the so-called right are seemingly guilty of.

Both the left and the right get so much wrong in terms in trying to force their beliefs onto others. Some of this has to do with bad manners and with a blatantly obvious lack of ethics, which I'll get to later in the post. However part of the problem is the fact that political parties even exist to begin with, which segues into my next point. 

​

2. Partisanism

Partisanism is a huge problem. It amounts to treating politics as a team sport rather than something to be carefully pondered. Partisans are much less likely to think critically than independents. Philosopher Crispin Sartwell makes a great argument for why ultra-partisans are more likely to be wrong about facts in a piece written for The Atlantic, "Fight With Your Friends About Politics." 

"We often know precisely what a political partisan will say about some controversial factual matter before they open their mouths and before the evidence comes in. It is a mistake to regard someone like that as a credible source of information," he states. 

The fact that political parties must exist in the first place is problematic. They are essentially utilitarian, consensus forming apparatuses. Jaques Ellul argues that political parties routinely undermine the democratic process itself: 

Parties channel free-floating opinion into existing formulas, polarizing it on opposites that do not necessarily correspond to the original tenets of such opinion. Because parties are so rigid, because they deal with only a part of any question, and because they are purely politically motivated, they distort public opinion and prevent it from forming naturally. [1]
​

3. Ignorance of Nuance and Lack of Critical Thinking

Arguments in politics are often incredibly nonconstructive. People seem to have no understanding of nuance - everything is a false dichotomy. We see all kinds of absurdities, one side accusing the other side of that which they themselves are guilty of, not checking to see if sources are as accurate as possible and so on and so on. As Ellul mentions above, we also see very simplistic arguments about what are incredibly complex political and economic subjects, things that even experts themselves may disagree on.

To combat all of this, perhaps we should try for a more Socratic outlook, whereby our reasoning proceeds from an assumption of our own ignorance rather than from partisan snap judgments. This has to do with being slow to form options, and being somewhat reasonable and humble rather rather than being a pompous know-it-all. 

We must also learn to separate our reasoning from our identity. Even someone without training in logic can learn to take a deep breath and think with some degree of distance and detachment when confronted with something that challenges their beliefs. I know because I have learned to do this myself! One strategy for being more reasonable is to consider the opposite point of view. It forces you to look at the other side's reasoning and consider that it may be sound. 


4. Agitation Propaganda 

Agitation propaganda is essentially demagoguery. It has to do with identifying the the latest enemy, finding someone to hate. The left and the right are both guilty of this; the only thing that differs is the person or group to be hated. Think statements along the lines of, "The problem is white men," or "The problem is trans people," and so on. 

Jaques Ellul identifies agitation propaganda, or agitprop, as strategic type of demagoguery meant to inspire the propagandee from resentment to action. Agitprop is used to shake up societal order in some way - towards war, division, a certain political party, group, or preferred outcome. It is designed to fire people up by appealing to their most basic anti-social instincts. Agitprop is subversive because once it begins to direct a person's prejudices, it is harder for them to retreat or to reconcile with their perceived opponents. Propaganda in general does not allow for civil debate and reconciliation. Hate, anger and momentum are agitation propaganda's most effective resources. Ellul states: 

"It is extremely easy to launch a revolutionary movement based on hatred of a particular enemy...Whether the object of hatred is the bourgeois, the Communist, the Jew, the colonialist, it makes no difference...Propaganda of agitation succeeds each time it designates someone as the source of all misery, provided that he is not too powerful. However, hatred once provoked continues to reproduce itself." [2]

Identity politics can be problematic because if we aren't careful, it can be a slippery slope from affirming one group to denouncing another. I'll get to that next. 
​

5. Belligerent Identity Politics

Identity politics is entirely out of control. I'm not saying that once meaningful outgrowths like the Women's Movement and Civil Rights weren't identitarian, but today's identity politics seems to have degenerated into a grievance-based tribalism in which everybody feels attacked. It is ripping society apart. Contemporary identity politics seems like little more than a narcissistic struggle for power, as well a useful divide and conquer tool for those who wish to push an agenda.

There is more to people than their group identity. Even if we happen to find value in this approach to politics, we must realize that it is inherently divisive. If we want to foster a sense of fellowship and shared community among people who must continue live together in the same country, then we need to focus primarily on a common humanity shared by everyone, rather than the narrow interests of groups divided up by gender, race, sexuality and so on. 

6. Bad Manners

This is basic incivility - a lack of respect/virtue/professionalism or whatever you want to call it. Bad manners involves the willingness to insult others personally (also a logical fallacy I may add), launching into angry diatribes making the exchange of ideas difficult, and at the most extreme, willingness to initiate political violence.

Radicals on the so-called left and so-called right clearly believe that the ends justify the means, since they are increasingly resorting to incivility and even violence directed at their political opponents. As I said before, when politics is perceived as a zero sum game, then there is no incentive for civility. In the absence of civility, everybody looses. We are reduced to acting like snarling beasts of the field. This threatens everyone's safety and stability.

The other problem is that you will never convince anybody of anything by being belligerent! The old adage that you get more flies with honey than with vinegar is basically correct. Remember what I said about having a Socratic outlook? Stop using anti-Socratic language if you want to convince someone. Here is a handy cheat-sheet of Socratic phrases to use in dialog. Socratic language is great. It fosters both critical thinking and basic respect for the other person's humanity. We should set higher standards for ourselves and refuse to have bad manners. 


7. Politicization of Everything

A while back, I wrote a post about Terrance Hoyt's argument that because of the decline of religion, the political and economic are increasingly treated as matters ultimate, even spiritual importance. Hoyt calls this disordered philosophy. Disordered philosophies have polarized public discourse to the point where political and economic policy issues are considered strictly moral:

"When activism is motivated by any felt moral absolute; any idea of perfection, it leads to an increase in political instability...Whether from the left or right, neither force nor freedom will make up for the absence of a philosophically robust notion of virtue in society," Hoyt states. 

Hoyt expands on this, defining a disordered philosophy as essentially egoistic,  advancing a kind of extremism motivated by a morally pure vision of society at any cost to stability (as opposed to maximizing the probability that most citizens are able to get their basic needs met in peace). Hoyt also argues that disordered philosophies conflate the economic and/or political with the strictly moral (the pursuit of virtue).  

Politics increasingly seems to be a vessel for some people to channel their neurosis and anger, rather than engaging in the difficult work of genuine introspection and personal growth. We should really take an honest look at ourselves to see if we aren't part of the problem before lashing out at our political opponents. French philosopher Pierre Hadot suggests that we do our best to remain composed:

The trick is to maintain oneself on the level of reason, not to allow oneself to be blinded by passions, anger, resentment or prejudices. To be sure, there is an equilibrium - almost impossible to achieve - between the inner peace brought about by wisdom, and the passions to which the sight of injustices, sufferings, and misery of mankind cannot help but give rise. Wisdom, however, consists in precisely such an equilibrium, and inner peace is indispensable for efficacious action. [3]


Do we have good manners? Are we slow to anger? Do we treat others that we disagree with civilly? Are we careful forming our opinions? Are we somewhat humble? Do we respect the humanity of others? These are all things that we can control. Politics may be divisive, but we don't have to be part of the problem.

Sources:

1.
Ellul, J. 1973. Propaganda. The Formation of Men’s Attitudes. New York: Vintage Books.
2. Ibid.
3. Hadot, P. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 274.


~

You May Also Like:
The Top 5 Reasons Political Independents Are Misunderstood
How The Left-Right Political Spectrum Deceives Us
How to Get Rid of the Need to Be Right


5 Comments
Winton link
1/26/2019 04:51:48 pm

Thanks Leah. I hope you manage to persuade some people to be more civil and reasonable.
I would like to share this post on my blog at some stage if you agree.

Reply
Leah
1/26/2019 05:25:10 pm

Thanks Winton, I hope so too. I'd be very happy to have you post it on your site, just let me know when you do. You had a post about Socrates that I'd like to run as a guest post here, probably in a few months.

Reply
Winton link
1/31/2019 03:01:16 pm

Thanks Leah. You are most welcome to re-publish my post about Socrates on the same terms.

JOHN N PAVLOVITS link
1/31/2019 11:48:05 am

It is so refreshing to read your thoughts. I believe that all of the most beautiful actions begin with beautiful thoughts.

I hope some day your words reach a wider audience, but I am afraid that you are not wanted in that arena.

Reply
Leah
1/31/2019 04:39:21 pm

Thanks John, I hope so too.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Growing in Goodness

    Welcome! If you like what you see here please subscribe:

    Don't Miss A Post!

    Sign up to receive updates and special announcements!

    Thank You For Subscribing to Common Sense Ethics!

    You have successfully joined my email list. 

    .
    Picture

    About Me:

    Thank you for your interest in Common Sense Ethics! I'm Leah, a librarian, editor and freelance writer with a background in history and philosophy.
    ​

    Most Popular Blog Posts:

    5 Things That You Need to be Happy According to Cicero

    Read These 5 Books for a Deeper Understanding of Politics

    Hope, Courage and Gratitude During Covid-19

    How the Left/Right Political Spectrum Deceives Us 
    ​
    Would You Risk Your Life For Philosophy?

    38 Life Lessons in 38 Years

    Why is Politics so Divisive?

    ​The Secret to Building a Close Family

    Why You Should Create Your Own Culture to Be Happier

    How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda

    ​The 10 Best Philosophy Books For Beginners

    The 13 Types of Modern Stoics...Which One Are You?

    4 Pieces of Stoic Wisdom for Dealing With Negative News Media

    How to be a Badass According to Cicero

    5 Ways to Avoid Being Manipulated and Dumbed Down by the Media

    Quick Guide: Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics in Modern Life

    The Secret to Happiness: Stoic Gratitude and the Art of Living

    What Everyone Needs to Know About Violence and Self Defense

    Download My Stoic Printables For Tough Days:

    Picture

    Watch Common Sense Ethics On YouTube:


    Support CSE:

    Picture
    Picture
    Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com


    Topics:

    All
    According To Cicero Series
    Alasdair Macintyre
    Albert Einstein
    Anger
    Antiauthoritarianism
    Applied Philosophy
    Aristotle
    Assertiveness
    Beauty
    Book Reviews
    Books And Reading
    Buddhism
    Carl Jung
    Cause And Effect
    Character Flaws
    Cicero
    Classical Education
    Cognitive Bias
    Consequence Based Ethics
    Cosmology
    Covert Manipulation
    Critical Thinking
    Culture
    Cynicism
    Death
    Descartes
    Destructive Behavior
    Economics
    Edmund Burke
    Education
    Egalitarianism
    Emotions
    Epictetus
    Ethical Objectivism
    Family
    Fortitude
    Francis-bacon
    Freedom
    Free Speech
    George-r-r-martin
    George-r-r-martin
    God
    Golden Rule
    Good Character
    Government
    Gratitude
    Happiness
    Heraclitus
    History
    Immanuel Kant
    Individual Rights
    Information Literacy
    Inner Life
    Integrity
    Introspection
    Intuition
    Iron Law Of Oligarchy
    Jaques Ellul
    John Locke
    John Sellars
    John Stuart Mill
    Jules Evans
    Karma
    Left-right Brain Balance
    Left-right Political Spectrum
    Liberal Democracy
    Literature
    Logic
    Marcus Aurelius
    Marriage
    Marx
    Mastering Emotion
    Media
    Metaethics
    Mindfullness
    Modern Stoicism
    Moral Relativism
    Moral Universalism
    Mortality
    Movies
    Musonius Rufus
    Musonius-rufus
    Natural Law
    Natural Rights
    Natural World
    Negative Freedom
    Negative-rights
    Neoplatonism
    Non Aggression
    Normative Ethics
    Normative-ethics
    Objectivismsubjectivism
    Oligarchy
    Parenting
    Personal Development
    Philosophy For Beginners
    Pierre Hadot
    Plato
    Politics
    Propaganda
    Psychology
    Pythagoreanism
    Relaxed Mental State
    Responsibility
    Rhetoric
    Right Vs. Wrong Actions
    Robert Nozik
    Roger Scruton
    Self Defense
    Self Discipline
    Seneca
    Simple Living
    Socrates
    Socratic Method
    Stoicism
    Stoic Meditation
    Stoic Virtues
    Television
    The Shadow
    Thomas Hobbes
    Traditionalism
    Trivium
    Utilitarianism
    Videos
    Violence
    Virtue Ethics
    War

    Archives:

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013


    ​Book of the Month: 

    Picture


    ​Personal Growth Resources:

    Picture
    Use this in-depth questionnaire to learn more about your faults and subconscious motivations.


    Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics In Modern Life:

    Picture


    ​Follow Common Sense Ethics on Pinterest:

    Picture


    ​Join the Stoic Parents Facebook Group:

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly