Common Sense Ethics
  • Blog
  • About
  • My Books
  • Parenting Resources
  • Personal Growth Resources
  • Book Summaries
  • Contact Me

What the Game of Thrones Ending Really Means

6/2/2019

4 Comments

 
Picture
Some tyrants come as liberators. That is the final twist in Game of Thrones, a show known for it's shocking plot twists. This is what George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire is ultimately about; what war really does to people, the difficultly of just rule, the inability to overcome personal moral failings, and the cyclical nature of tyranny.  
​
Game of Thrones, the show based on the Song of Ice and Fire novels, is a bit more about putting spectacle over story. But Queen Daenerys as the final villain, rather than Cersei or the Night King, is George R. R. Martin's surprise ending, make no mistake about it. Viewers were naturally horrified to watch a sympathetic character turn bad, but that's the whole point! We were tricked in order to get us to understand the cruelty and horror of war by watching a character we knew and maybe liked become a tyrant. 

This isn't just my hot take on it, either. George R. R. Martin was a conscientious objector to the Vietnam War. He acknowledges that the perception of war as something glorious is a problem. Though not a radical pacifist, he states in this interesting clip that his goal with A Song of Ice and Fire, is to show the true cost of war.

Violence under the guise of "breaking the wheel," promoting democracy, human rights, and most other justifications is still abominable. That is why we should be looking for non-violent solutions to problems rather than perpetually glorifying war and violent conflict. 

As a quick aside before I get to the real meat and bones of this post - some people have criticized how the show runners have handled the ending of Game of Thrones. Especially, that they have rushed the plot along at the expense of character development by deciding to shorten the final two seasons, and that the writing in those seasons was lacking.

Those criticisms are absolutely valid, and the rushed nature of the final six episodes is the main reason why many people did not like the ending.

But, let's be clear - the reason the show ended the way it did, with Daenerys becoming the final villain, is because of the overarching anti-war theme in the novels. Back in 2014, I wrote about this topic in a post entitled Evil in the Hearts of Men: Pacifism and Ethics in Game of Thrones/A Song of Ice and Fire. 

And to be fair, regardless of the poor writing that hampered the final three Game of Thrones seasons, it's probably safe to assume that in 2010 when filming began, the show runners didn't expect to be writing the ending to George R. R. Martin's still unfinished novels. They expected to adapt two finished novels, which still as of this writing have not been published - an unfortunate topic for another day.  

So, instead, let's discuss what the show's ending is really about. 
​​

The True Cost of War

The reason the end of Game of Thrones is so shocking - a hero becomes a villain - is because it is also easy to sympathize with Daenerys, at least on the surface. She was a lonely girl who had been running from Robert Baratheon's assassins her whole life, was sold to a warlord by her own brother, and then managed to amass great power against all odds. 

But really, if you look closely, the warning signs had been there all along. Daenerys originally surrounded herself with advisers who's job it was to check her baser instincts, but as the story progresses, she begins to become more ruthless. In the course of her conquests, Daenerys burned or crucified anyone who stood in her way, and only her advisers restrained her from doing worse.

I would not say that Daenerys necessarily goes mad when she decides to Burn King's landing to the ground - she is doing what makes sense to her. She even says as much to Jon Snow, in a Machiavellian turn, that she must rule by fear. Total war with maximum civilian casualties is a strategy used to instill fear and ensure conquest.

Genghis Khan, whom the Dothraki were modeled after, was known for using the total war tactic historically. The Mongol armies sometimes sacked a city and killed everyone in it, that way, the next city would simply pay tribute rather than risk having the same thing happening to them. 

George R. R. Martin is on record stating that dragon's are like weapons of mass destruction that can inflict massive civilian casualties and damage. Episode Five drove this home. Arya, even a trained assassin who took out the Night King, was completely powerless against the unstoppable force of a dragon.

We weren't supposed to cheer for Daenerys and her dragons all along, or Robb Stark, or even Stannis for that matter, because all that they really brought to Westeros was death and chaos through endless war. No one wins in war, and innocents suffer when the high lords seek power. As Bertrand Russell writes, war doesn't determine who is right, only who is left.

This is why it is great that diplomacy wins out at the end of the show rather than recourse to more conflict. 
​

Personal Moral Failure

One of the main themes in the book and the show seems to be the inability to overcome the limitations of your upbringing and personal failings. 

George R. R. Martin takes the Aristotelian view that most people struggle with moral choice and ambiguity, rather than a Hobbesian view that people are naturally bad. "All of us have the capacity for good and all of us have the capacity for evil; it's a question of the decisions we make… I like to paint in shades of gray and to try to reflect, even in a fantasy context, some of the complexities of real life,” Martin states. 

Jamie Lannister's arc (assuming it ends similarly in the books) has to do with the limits of redemption and the draw of pathological relationships. Jamie starts out a very morally murky character. He pushes Bran Stark out a window, leaving him paralyzed, in order to conceal his incestuous relationship with his sister Cersei, an even more morally murky character. This action on Jamie's part is one of the major causes of the War of the five Kings, a tragedy that envelopes Westeros.

But as the story progresses, we see Jamie flourish. He manages to separate himself from Cersei's pathological influence. Through his relationship with Brienne and other factors, he becomes a more honorable man. But when Jamie hears from Sansa that Cersei will likely die when Danny attacks King's Landing, he can't help himself but return to her, although this action directly leads to his death.

Jamie's failure to be fully redeemed ultimately hinges on his inability to overcome his upbringing and unhealthy love and family dynamic. Unlike Theon, another redeemed character who was raised by Ned Stark, an essentially honorable man, Jamie was raised by Tywin Lannister, who is shrewd, megalomaniacal and nepotistic.  

Jamie's story is a subversion of the hero's journey, and unfortunately rather true to life. Many people fail at becoming what they could ideally be. Assuming the books play out in similar fashion, sometimes habits and upbringing are just too strong to overcome. 


Just Rule Is Difficult (Or Maybe Even Impossible)

George R.R. Martin, in a long interview with Rolling Stone magazine has criticized J.R.R.Tolkien‘s The Lord of the Rings for over-simplification of the themes that it deals with, especially Tolkien’s portrayal of power:

Ruling is hard. This was maybe my answer to Tolkien, whom, as much as I admire him, I do quibble with. Lord of the Rings had a very medieval philosophy: that if the king was a good man, the land would prosper. We look at real history and it’s not that simple. Tolkien can say that Aragorn became king and reigned for a hundred years, and he was wise and good. But Tolkien doesn’t ask the question: What was Aragorn’s tax policy? Did he maintain a standing army? What did he do in times of flood and famine? And what about all these orcs? By the end of the war, Sauron is gone but all of the orcs aren’t gone – they’re in the mountains. Did Aragorn pursue a policy of systematic genocide and kill them? Even the little baby orcs, in their little orc cradles?

Martin hits on the reason that just rule is so hard, or even impossible, and it essentially boils down to a utilitarian problem with the nature of leadership and government itself.

For better or worse, rule is usually a matter of give and take, or balancing one group's rights with those of another. Often there are no ideal solutions to political problems. Rule always requires compromise, but very often, that compromise entails someone getting unjustly punished or killed. This is why ideally, political compromise should avoid recourse to violence as I mentioned above. 

Those in power often do what is politically expedient in the name of the "greater good". But what about the people on the loosing end? There is no greater good if it's you and your family who gets unjustly punished or killed by political compromise, so how can that be just? It's paradoxical. 

Realistically, when it comes to government, there is better and there is worse, but no ideal. I am launching a Socratic Dialog on Government on my YouTube channel in the coming months to discuss this very perplexing problem. 

Tyranny is Cyclical

The final lesson to take away from the finale of Game of Thrones is that if we look at history, tyranny is cyclical. 

British historian Baron Acton is famous for the old adage that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. It is not entirely clear whether Acton is correct because the power-hungry purposefully seek out positions which will allow them to exercise control, or because of some general flaw shared among most of humanity where increased power correspondingly erodes our sense of morality.

But certainly this tendency accounts, or partially accounts, for why tyranny is  cyclical. Power can turn even a good person bad. As Daenerys' power grew, so did her thirst for death and vengeance. 
She is fond of burning people alive, after all. But many people accepted her as a hero because of the way she is presented - a beautiful woman who's actions seemed to be justified if we don't look too closely.
​
​This story is about letting history play out exactly as it always has. Nothing has changed. What we witnessed is the rise of a tyrant. Some of us rooted for her and watched in awe as she conquered foe after foe. And then we saw it. The final villain in the series is not the Night King and it's not Cersei: it's Daenerys. 

Either way, the corrupting influence of power should be acknowledged, along with the fact that it takes a person of exceptional character to resist the various temptations of power. This is perhaps why Varys, who is well acquainted with tyrants, argues that Jon Snow should rule since he does not desire power.

George R. R. Martin's writing makes it clear that the person who desires the throne should not be on it. For this reason I personally found Bran's ascension satisfying, even if the show writing was a bit muddled and rushed.

Though it isn't ultimately clear that oligarchy will stop the cycle of tyranny any better than hereditary monarchy has, at least for a time, there will be peace in Westeros. 

-----

So what can we learn about the human condition from Game of Thrones? ​

First, no matter how benevolent they appear, leaders should never be viewed as heroes. We should always remain somewhat skeptical about their motives. Some tyrants come as liberators. 

​Second, we should look for non-violent solutions to problems if we ever want to "break the wheel." Have you ever seen a war where innocents did not die by the thousands?  That is what George R. R. Martin's story has always been about. 
 

You May Also Like:
Breaking Bad's Secret Message
Solomon Kane: Must See Fantasy Flick About the Surprising Paradox of Nonviolence
Is Democratic Government a Utopian Ideal? 
Picture
4 Comments
Janice Hill
6/4/2019 06:10:10 am

Even if I hated the TV ending and hated the writing even more, you make an excellent case for it. Maybe you could call your youtube series, "The Lesser of Two Weevils."

Reply
Leah
6/4/2019 06:50:06 am

Thanks Janice, and thanks for commenting. My problem is not with the plot but with the execution. You can bet that it will be well executed in the books, if we ever see them.

I was surprised though how thoroughly the show runners committed to Dany as tyrant in episode 5, since they had seemed very warm to her whereas I had long suspected that would happen.

Haha, that's a good one. It really is the lesser of two evils and that's what I plan to discuss over the course of several interviews.

Reply
Tommaso Mazzoni
2/18/2021 02:05:39 pm

I'm totally unsatisfied with both the plot and the execution I prefer Tolkien vision. The true enemy was the Night King, and it should have ended with Jon and Dany on the throne; In war innocents dies but under a tyranny they die worse death. You can avoid violence only if on the other side there are humans and not Orcs, or Others, or Cersei.

Reply
Leah
2/28/2021 05:23:58 pm

Hi, thanks for commenting. Yes, I agree that like Tolkien better of course, but GRRM is all about subverting common fantasy tropes. Things like the supernatural bad guy as the great evil, the hero ends up king and so on. I do like the antiwar message in the books. And Danny was always somewhat tyrannical. Doesn't make for a good ruler. Sic semper tyrannis!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Don't Miss A Post!

    Sign up to receive updates and special announcements!

    Thank You For Subscribing to Common Sense Ethics!

    You have successfully joined my email list. 

    .
    Picture

    About Me:

    Thank you for your interest in Common Sense Ethics! I'm Leah, a librarian and freelance editor with a background in history and philosophy.
    ​

    Most Popular Blog Posts:

    3 Unpopular (But Likely Correct) Opinions According to Cicero

    Beauty in Philosophy, Ethics and Art: A Conversation with David Fideler

    5 Ways to Counterbalance an Ugly and Barren Cultural Landscape

    How Propaganda Makes us Psychologically Totalitarian

    5 Things That You Need to be Happy According to Cicero

    5 Wholesome Character Education Books to Read to Your Child

    Why is Politics so Divisive?

    9 Great Critical Thinking Books for Children and Teens

    Why You Should Create Your Own Culture to Be Happier

    How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda

    ​The 10 Best Philosophy Books For Beginners

    The 13 Types of Modern Stoics...Which One Are You?

    How to be a Badass According to Cicero

    Quick Guide: Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics in Modern Life

    Download My Stoic Printables For Tough Days:

    Picture

    Watch Common Sense Ethics On YouTube:


    Support CSE:

    Picture
    Picture
    Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com


    Topics:

    All
    According To Cicero Series
    Aesthetics
    Alasdair Macintyre
    Albert Einstein
    American Revolution
    Ancient Greece
    Ancient Rome
    Anger
    Antiauthoritarianism
    Applied Philosophy
    Aristotle
    Assertiveness
    Beauty
    Book Reviews
    Books And Reading
    Buddhism
    Carl Jung
    Cause And Effect
    Character Flaws
    Cicero
    Classical Education
    Cognitive Bias
    Consequence Based Ethics
    Consumerism
    Cosmology
    Covert Manipulation
    Critical Thinking
    Culture
    Cynicism
    Death
    Descartes
    Destructive Behavior
    Economics
    Edmund Burke
    Education
    Egalitarianism
    Emotions
    Epictetus
    Ethical Objectivism
    Family
    Fortitude
    Francis-bacon
    Freedom
    Freedom Of Speech
    Free Speech
    George-r-r-martin
    George-r-r-martin
    God
    Golden Rule
    Good Character
    Government
    Gratitude
    Happiness
    Heraclitus
    History
    Immanuel Kant
    Individual Rights
    Information Literacy
    Inner Life
    Integrity
    Introspection
    Intuition
    Iron Law Of Oligarchy
    Jaques Ellul
    John Locke
    John Sellars
    John Stuart Mill
    Jules Evans
    Karma
    Left-right Brain Balance
    Left-right Political Spectrum
    Liberal Democracy
    Literature
    Logic
    Marcus Aurelius
    Marriage
    Marx
    Mastering Emotion
    Media
    Metaethics
    Mindfullness
    Moderation/temperance
    Modern Stoicism
    Moral Relativism
    Moral Universalism
    Mortality
    Movies
    Musonius Rufus
    Musonius-rufus
    Natural Law
    Natural Rights
    Natural World
    Negative Freedom
    Negative-rights
    Neoplatonism
    Non Aggression
    Normative Ethics
    Normative-ethics
    Objectivismsubjectivism
    Oligarchy
    Parenting
    Personal Development
    Philosophy For Beginners
    Pierre Hadot
    Plato
    Politics
    Propaganda
    Psychology
    Pythagoreanism
    Relaxed Mental State
    Renaissance
    Responsibility
    Rhetoric
    Right Vs. Wrong Actions
    Robert Nozik
    Roger Scruton
    Self Defense
    Self Discipline
    Seneca
    Sexuality
    Simple Living
    Socrates
    Socratic Method
    Stoicism
    Stoic Meditation
    Stoic Virtues
    Television
    The Shadow
    Thomas Hobbes
    Traditionalism
    Trivium
    Utilitarianism
    Videos
    Violence
    Virtue Ethics
    War

    Archives:

    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013


    ​Book of the Month: Journal Like a Stoic by Brittany Polat

    Picture


    ​Personal Growth Resources:

    Picture
    Use this in-depth questionnaire to learn more about your faults and subconscious motivations.


    Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics In Modern Life:

    Picture


    ​Follow Common Sense Ethics on Pinterest:

    Picture


    ​Join the Stoic Parents Facebook Group:

    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.