Common Sense Ethics
  • Blog
  • About
  • My Books
  • Parenting Resources
  • Personal Growth Resources
  • Book Summaries
  • Contact Me

Why We Desperately Need Rights-Based Ethics

3/4/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Natural rights based morality is the core position on which I base some of my commentary here at Common Sense Ethics. It is important to clarify exactly what natural rights are, and what types of actions they compel us to refrain from morally speaking.

The classical concept of natural rights is more or less synonymous with the concept of human rights or moral rights. Rights are essentially claims against others to be treated in certain ways.Natural rights differ from conventional rights, which  are rights created by people in a social, legal or political context.

Normative ethics, also called moral theory, is broad field of philosophical study about how we should live or behave. Natural Rights based ethics represents a cohesive and common sense normative position which upholds a necessary respect for human dignity.

We have natural or moral rights by virtue of being human. For this reason, natural rights are sometimes referred to as inalienable or absolute. Human beings have dignity, and thus we all have the inherent right not to be killed, raped, coerced, or stolen from.


The Categorical Imperative and the Basis For Natural Rights

Natural rights fall into the class of rights considered “negative,” in ethics. The concept of negative rights can be summed up as the condition of being free from certain types of harm or interference at the hands of others. This places a moral duty or limit on other people to refrain from specific harm or interference.

Certain negative moral constraints, including refraining from theft, rape, murder, and so forth are considered prima facie, meaning that the legitimacy of the constraint is accepted “on its face.” The natural right of humans not be murdered, raped or stolen from, are essentially prima facie rights which almost no one disputes.

Such an understanding can be based on Kant’s famous Categorical Imperative, “Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.”

Kant thought that moral duties depend on a basic human rationality. He considered this rationality the highest principle of morality. The categorical imperative is the basic form of the moral law. We must act with respect to it in order to be moral.

Natural rights ethics give rise to a consistent moral code of conduct for how one ought to live without violating anyone's rights. The obvious moral code of conduct based on natural rights ethics is straightforward, which I broke down previously in my post How to Tell Right From Wrong in 10 Seconds or Less. As a rational human being, you have inherent rights, and you also have a moral obligation to refrain from murder, theft, rape, or coercion in your interactions with others.

Political Ramifications of Natural Rights Based Ethics

Natural rights ethics is a moral theory which has political implications, not the other way around. Most people agree that one should not murder, steal, or coerce.

However, there are also certain inevitable conclusions about government which cannot be separated out from natural rights based ethics. If natural rights conflict with conventional rights accorded to individuals by the laws of the state, then the morality of the state can sometimes be called into question.

Political philosophies based on natural rights ethics includes deontological liberalism,  which is also known as natural-rights libertarianism, or philosophical libertarianism. I’ll use the terms deontological liberalism and natural-rights libertarianism interchangeably in this post.

The philosophy holds that the government has no more right to murder, coerce or steal than and individual does, and since these actions are categorically wrong for individuals, they are wrong for the state as well.

Deontological liberalism is an attractive political philosophy both because of the balanced position of concern for the rights of others which it represents, and because of the logical consistency of the arguments put forth by Robert Nozik in particular.

Nozik’s position is well laid out in his seminal work, Anarchy, State and Utopia. In the first line of the book, he states, “Individuals have rights, and there are things no person or group may do to them (without violating their rights).”

I’ll stop my commentary here, because the aim of this blog is not to address large abstracts like government, but rather to focus on personal conduct and individual solutions for personal growth.

However, with regard to critical thinking, there is one caveat I might as well address.


A Trap For the Mind

I don’t consider deontological liberalism to be a definitely left or right political philosophy. The minute someone puts an argument or philosophy into the arbitrary context of "left," or "right," politics, some people’s critical thinking tends to stop and emotionality takes over.

This is exactly the type of knee jerk reaction that I myself try to avoid, and that I do not wish to convey through my writing.

The terms left and right have been applied to political philosophy historically, but it is important to note that they are amoral in and of themselves. How left or right something is says absolutely nothing about morality.

The left-right political spectrum represents a kind of dualistic trap for the mind, which implies that there are only two extremes of political thought, represented by fascism on the far right, and authoritarian communism on the far left. A linear left-right political scale says nothing about how moral, stateist, or anti-authoritarian a government is, so the scale is incomplete at best, and false at worst.

Interestingly, the words liberal and libertarian both come from the same root word in Latin, liber, which means free, independent or unrestrained, and libertas, which means freedom. Classical liberalism is the same thing as today’s libertarianism. In contemporary American politics however, the terms have unfortunately come to represent what are in some ways, opposing ideologies.


A Code To Live By

Natural rights ethics is properly understood as a consistent and common sense moral code of conduct for everyone. Putting humanity in its rightful position of dignity and responsibility, as rational agents, in possession of inalienable rights, should be something we can all get behind and agree to live in accord with.


~

Related Posts:

Reconciling The Subjectivism/Objectivism Distinction in Meta-Ethics

Basic, Common Sense Ethical Principles That You Need To Know


How To Tell Right From Wrong In 10 Seconds or Less

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Don't Miss A Post!

    Sign up to receive updates and special announcements!

    Thank You For Subscribing to Common Sense Ethics!

    You have successfully joined my email list. 

    .
    Picture

    About Me:

    Thank you for your interest in Common Sense Ethics! I'm Leah, a librarian and freelance editor with a background in history and philosophy.
    ​

    Most Popular Blog Posts:

    3 Unpopular (But Likely Correct) Opinions According to Cicero

    Beauty in Philosophy, Ethics and Art: A Conversation with David Fideler

    5 Ways to Counterbalance an Ugly and Barren Cultural Landscape

    How Propaganda Makes us Psychologically Totalitarian

    5 Things That You Need to be Happy According to Cicero

    5 Wholesome Character Education Books to Read to Your Child

    Why is Politics so Divisive?

    9 Great Critical Thinking Books for Children and Teens

    Why You Should Create Your Own Culture to Be Happier

    How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda

    ​The 10 Best Philosophy Books For Beginners

    The 13 Types of Modern Stoics...Which One Are You?

    How to be a Badass According to Cicero

    Quick Guide: Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics in Modern Life

    Download My Stoic Printables For Tough Days:

    Picture

    Watch Common Sense Ethics On YouTube:


    Support CSE:

    Picture
    Picture
    Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com


    Topics:

    All
    According To Cicero Series
    Aesthetics
    Alasdair Macintyre
    Albert Einstein
    American Revolution
    Ancient Greece
    Ancient Rome
    Anger
    Antiauthoritarianism
    Applied Philosophy
    Aristotle
    Assertiveness
    Beauty
    Book Reviews
    Books And Reading
    Buddhism
    Carl Jung
    Cause And Effect
    Character Flaws
    Cicero
    Classical Education
    Cognitive Bias
    Consequence Based Ethics
    Consumerism
    Cosmology
    Covert Manipulation
    Critical Thinking
    Culture
    Cynicism
    Death
    Descartes
    Destructive Behavior
    Economics
    Edmund Burke
    Education
    Egalitarianism
    Emotions
    Epictetus
    Ethical Objectivism
    Family
    Fortitude
    Francis-bacon
    Freedom
    Freedom Of Speech
    Free Speech
    George-r-r-martin
    George-r-r-martin
    God
    Golden Rule
    Good Character
    Government
    Gratitude
    Happiness
    Heraclitus
    History
    Immanuel Kant
    Individual Rights
    Information Literacy
    Inner Life
    Integrity
    Introspection
    Intuition
    Iron Law Of Oligarchy
    Jaques Ellul
    John Locke
    John Sellars
    John Stuart Mill
    Jules Evans
    Karma
    Left-right Brain Balance
    Left-right Political Spectrum
    Liberal Democracy
    Literature
    Logic
    Marcus Aurelius
    Marriage
    Marx
    Mastering Emotion
    Media
    Metaethics
    Mindfullness
    Moderation/temperance
    Modern Stoicism
    Moral Relativism
    Moral Universalism
    Mortality
    Movies
    Musonius Rufus
    Musonius-rufus
    Natural Law
    Natural Rights
    Natural World
    Negative Freedom
    Negative-rights
    Neoplatonism
    Non Aggression
    Normative Ethics
    Normative-ethics
    Objectivismsubjectivism
    Oligarchy
    Parenting
    Personal Development
    Philosophy For Beginners
    Pierre Hadot
    Plato
    Politics
    Propaganda
    Psychology
    Pythagoreanism
    Relaxed Mental State
    Renaissance
    Responsibility
    Rhetoric
    Right Vs. Wrong Actions
    Robert Nozik
    Roger Scruton
    Self Defense
    Self Discipline
    Seneca
    Sexuality
    Simple Living
    Socrates
    Socratic Method
    Stoicism
    Stoic Meditation
    Stoic Virtues
    Television
    The Shadow
    Thomas Hobbes
    Traditionalism
    Trivium
    Utilitarianism
    Videos
    Violence
    Virtue Ethics
    War

    Archives:

    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013


    ​Book of the Month: Journal Like a Stoic by Brittany Polat

    Picture


    ​Personal Growth Resources:

    Picture
    Use this in-depth questionnaire to learn more about your faults and subconscious motivations.


    Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics In Modern Life:

    Picture


    ​Follow Common Sense Ethics on Pinterest:

    Picture


    ​Join the Stoic Parents Facebook Group:

    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.