Common Sense Ethics
Follow Common Sense Ethics:
  • Blog
  • About
  • Books & Book Reviews
  • Parenting Resources
  • Personal Growth Resources
  • Contact Me

Solomon Kane: Must See Fantasy Flick About the Surprising Paradox of Nonviolence

2/19/2016

10 Comments

 
Picture

While doing research for this post, I came across the unusual phrase "A lasting peace, through the judicious use of the spear." This phrase perfectly sums up the salient moral message in Solomon Kane, an independent Sword and Sorcery film about a Puritan vigilante sworn to fight evil in 16th Century England.
​ 
Far from being another film full of gratuitous violence, Solomon Kane explores a rather profound ethical question: when does adherence to nonviolence trump the moral and personal obligation to protect your life, or the lives of your family, from immanent harm? 

Solomon Kane 
offers an unexpected axiom on the paradox of nonviolent philosophy. Pacifism is undoubtedly a philosophy arising from a selfless desire to not harm others. Pacifists view all violence as a moral failing. But paradoxically, the failure to protect others from immanent rape, murder, etc, when in a position to do so, leads to them being harmed. Under certain circumstances, nonviolence is actually a selfish philosophy, rather than a selfless philosophy.

In a world where evil people rape and murder, forceful opposition to violence is not only pragmatic, it necessary and moral. The most pragmatic and ethical position is nonaggression, rather than nonviolence.


I am the Only Devil Here

Solomon Kane is the creation of the 1920s pulp writer Robert E. Howard. The character was adapted for film in 2009 by independent screenwriter and director Michael J. Bassett, starring James Purefoy in the title role. If you like sword and sorcery fantasy, or shows like Game of Thrones, then you will probably enjoy this film, even though it had much smaller budget. Be aware that this post contains some plot spoilers, but does not spoil the film's ending.

Kane starts out the movie as a disinherited nobleman turned sea captain and marauder under Francis Drake. He's a bad guy...so bad in fact, that the Devil's own emissary comes to claim his soul and whisk him away to Hell.

In the opening sequence, Kane and his men are attacked by demons while plundering a fortress in North Africa. Rather than allow a retreat, Kane shoots his own men in the back stating "I am the only devil here." As he approaches the throne room, Satan's Reaper appears to claim him for his life of murder and greed. Rather than allow his soul to be damned, Kane asks for God's protection, and escapes. 

We next find Solomon Kane holed up in a monastery in England a year later. He has renounced violence and given all his wealth to the church. The abbot has been mediating on Kane's continued presence there, and feels that God's path for Solomon lies elsewhere. Solomon reluctantly leaves the sanctuary of the monastery.


The Soul of the Lord Hates...Those Who Love Violence

Solomon Kane becomes a Puritan after he repents his past life of murder and pillage. The Puritans were a group of English Reformed Protestants who sought to "purify," the Roman Catholic Church in 16th and 17th Century England. Puritans were generally literate with a goal of personal conformity to the Scripture.

Puritans were not historically known for pacifism, however they were concerned with a personal and inward journey away from sin and pride and towards the will of God, which could include various Biblical prescripts. Many Scriptural passages provide a basis for renunciation of violence including:

"But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also." Matthew 5:39 

"The soul of the Lord hates…those who love violence​." Psalm 11:15. 


​From this Scriptural basis we find Kane dedicating himself to a life of peace in his search for salvation, fearing that his soul will be damned should he ever again take up the sword. He confesses that before becoming a man of God, killing was easy for him, and that he was most at home in battle.

I've renounced Violence. That's a Shame...We Haven't!

When Kane is turned out of the monastery, we find that he is abroad in troubled and turbulent times. A lord in the West is burning local villages, killing the men and taking the women prisoner.

Solomon is attacked on the road by three ruffians who rob him and beat him. Refusing to fight back, he states, "I have renounced violence." "Well, that's a shame," says one of the men, "because we haven't!" This scene is potent foreshadowing for later plot points.

Solomon is found beaten and unconscious by a Puritan family who are making a pilgrimage to the New World. The family take him in since they share the same faith and are also sworn to peace. He confesses his past to the patriarch, William, when asked to join the family on their journey:


Solomon: That's a kind offer, William, very kind, thank you. I should be honest with you. You should know the kind of man you're thinking of taking in. I've done bad things, terrible things, cruel things. I am a...No, I was, was an evil, evil man.
William Crowthorn: But the Lord speaks of redemption and forgiveness.
Solomon: No, my soul is damned. Satan's creatures will take me should I stray from the path of peace.
William Crowthorn: Then do not stray, Master Kane.


Unfortunately for the Crowthorn family, they are attacked in their camp by a gang of thugs. One holds a knife to the youngest son's throat, while others restrain William and his wife and daughters. Knowing what a great fighter Solomon was, the family plead with him to do something to stop the men from harming them. Not wanting to break his vow of peace, Solomon begs the men to leave the boy alone.

The thugs mock Solomon and stab the boy and William anyway. In that instant, Solomon selflessly breaks his vow of peace in order to defend the family, while realizing that he may have just damned himself to Hell. He successfully fights off most of the men, but in the milieu, William's daughter Meredeth is kidnapped.


Rescue the Weak and the Needy

The scene reveals a fundamental problem with the adherence to nonviolence. If Solomon had taken immediate action, would the Crowthornes still be alive?

Does adherence to a pacifist ideal trump the moral and personal obligation to protect life? What happens in the moment when your life is on the line, or the lives of your family members or innocent bystanders? Can inaction, even based on principle, actually lead to the harm that pacifists are trying to prevent?

The nonviolent ideal, while based on good intentions, is elitist. If you claim to value lives of others, then why group those who initiate violence, rape and murder into the same category of moral failure as those who use physical force to protect themselves and defend innocent life from harm?

As William lays dying, he begs Solomon to find and rescue his daughter, Meredith. Solomon agrees, in keeping with Psalm 82:4: "Rescue the weak and needy; Deliver them out of the hand of the wicked."

Solomon sees that begging avowed killers and rapists not to harm innocents is futile. What is more, he was in a position to save lives, yet his inaction, in the name of God, may have actually caused the loss of innocent life. It is one thing to think that force isn't the best response in most situations; it is another to view all force as a moral failing, even in self defense or defense of the innocent.

Later while searching for Meredith, he discusses the difficultly of the Christian nonviolent position with a priest:


Priest: God protects the faithful [from violence].
Solomon: How can it be right? That this evil is left to walk the Earth, while all we have to protect ourselves is what? Simple Faith?


There Are Many Paths to Redemption, Not All of Them Peaceful

Which moral position is right? What is the movie trying to prove? The Bible warns against improperly resorting to the sword, as Kane does at the beginning of the film. Yet Scripture also states that "The righteous are as bold as a lion." Proverbs 28:1.  

Kane's personal journey is one from violent aggressor, to penitent pacifist, to selfless hero and rescuer. Kane puts his own life on the line to help others. Solomon eventually realizes this as the correct path for him, and this is moral message the film attempts to send. As the abbot states when Solomon leaves the monastery, "There are many paths to redemption, not all of them peaceful."

The director of the movie, Michael J. Bassett admits as much in this interview:

Interviewer: It seemed to me – and I wasn’t sure if this was a comment that the film was making about the difficulties of nonviolence – but it seemed to me that the family dropped their adherence to nonviolence when it was their children’s lives on the line. The parents start crying to Kane to “do something.” They’re commissioning Kane to be violent on their behalf, it seems.
Director Michael J. Bassett: That’s absolutely a correct interpretation. You can only write from your own heart. I’ve got kids, and it’s like, “I will be as pacifist as possible until my children are threatened.” And when they are, you ask, "Well, what’s more important? Is my faith more important than my family?"
 And that, I think, is a really powerful moral dilemma for anybody. And on top of that, Pete Postlethwaite’s character has to turn to this man Kane and make him break his vow. They say to him, “Do something!” And he has to say, “If I do something, I’m as cursed as when I started the movie.” It’s the fundamental moral crux of the whole movie: What would you do? I want the audience to be willing him to break his vow, and at the same time, to understand what is at stake for him.
..But I think the death of innocents is a potent catalyst for a violent act.

Solomon Kane is ultimately about our duties to others. If you can protect and rescue the weak, is that not based on a higher moral principle than your personal desire for salvation through the renunciation of violence? When Solomon tries to rescue Meredith, he is asked:

Malachi: "Why do you care for her? You came here to save your soul."
Solomon: She IS my soul."


Redefining Violence: The Non Aggression Principle

Peace is the ideal condition. Immanuel Kant argued that if everyone vowed not to initiate violence, the world would be entirely peaceful. Unfortunately, the world is not always peaceful, even though many of us live in much safer conditions than were present in the past. Given this reality, adherence to the non-aggression principle, rather than strict nonviolence, is the most ethical and pragmatic position.

To quote my earlier post on the non-aggression principle, I argue that most people have an overly broad definition of violence which renders physical acts of aggressiveness and self defense indistinguishable from one another. Aggressive violence is not the same thing as physical force used to defend yourself or another innocent person, against immanent harm, injury or death. Self defense should not be morally condemned in the same way that aggression should.

Non-aggression respects both the moral obligation that we have not to initiate violence against others, while simultaneously avowing the need for self defense and protection of loved ones should it arise.

So there you have it. Solomon Kane illustrates that pacifism is in fact paradoxical when violent people rape, maim and murder. While peace is ideal, we should practice a philosophy of nonaggression instead of nonviolence. We should ditch the elitist attitude towards those who fight back against violence directed at themselves or their families. Forceful resistance to violence is not only ethical; in an imperfect world, it is necessary. 

~



You May Also Enjoy These Posts:

Evil in the Hearts of Men: Pacifism in Game of Thrones and A Song of Ice and Fire
Breaking Bad's Secret Message
What Everyone Needs to Know About Violence and Self Defense
10 Comments
Gregory Sadler link
2/29/2016 08:07:11 am

Excellent piece here, which I very much enjoyed reading and mulling over!

I watched the movie myself some time back on my own, and was impressed enough that I shared it with my wife.

I think that what was particularly compelling about the movie was that while going off into fantasy, it did get a side of the Puritans right that often gets left out, that it represented a way of attempting to live out a Christian life in a morally murky, early modern world.

Reply
Leah
2/29/2016 08:33:33 am

Thank you Greg!

I absolutely agree with your thoughts on the film.

Best Regards,

Leah

Reply
Brian link
11/29/2018 07:47:41 pm

Great Movie

Reply
Leah
11/30/2018 05:41:09 am

Hi Brian,

It is a great movie! I recently rewatched it several times on Netflix streaming. I also watched Van Helsing (who's character seems to be based somewhat off of Howard's Kane) and I was struck by how poorly it compares with Solomon Kane as a film.

Reply
Winton link
12/2/2018 04:14:42 am

Leah, I agree that the movie makes the case for non-aggression.
However, I don’t think it is a great movie - in my view, excessive fantasy got in the way of a good story about how the world works.

Reply
Leah Goldrick
12/2/2018 04:34:04 am

Sorry you didn't like it Winton..I enjoy the sword and sorcery genre so it is right up my alley.

Reply
WildHuntsman
8/28/2019 07:25:10 am

I really enjoyed the movie. Reminds me a bit of Witcher 3. Great post as well about the folly of viewing all violence as "bad" regardless of context, circumstances etc.

"It is characteristic of nowadays to talk with horror of killing rather than of murder, and since in war, one has committed oneself to killing, one has accepted evil, not to mind whom you kill. This seems to be the work of the devil."

GEM Anscombe.

Reply
Leah
8/28/2019 02:59:31 pm

Witcher 3, I had to look that up :-). My husband is more of a gamer than I am.

Thanks for commenting and for the interesting quote from Anscombe. I'm not really aware of her philosophy, but it seems that I should be.

As you may have guessed from the post, I am strongly in favor of non-aggression, which means that I really have deep difficulty accepting war; it always entails horror and chaos.

Sorting out what a true self-defensive war looks like, the "context," of the violence as you say, becomes more complicated on a national scale than between individuals. There are always other factors involved in addition to the stated reasons for the war - such as the influence of financiers and corporations who seek to profit and so forth.

I guess that is why I am in favor of diplomacy and of being well-armed as a deterrent to conflict to begin with, paradoxical as it may seem.

I'd welcome other people's thoughts on this topic since my own aren't firmly settled.

Reply
WildHuntsman
8/28/2019 08:40:50 pm

Thanks! I'm not sure what Anscombe subscribes to either, though I hear she was a catholic ethicist who opposed the atomic bombings in Japan. Agree thoroughly on the need for diplomacy rather than belligerence (as neocons were too fond of in the early 21st century).

Reply
Leah
9/3/2019 02:06:08 pm

Yes I agree!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Growing in Goodness

    Welcome! If you like what you see here please subscribe:

    Don't Miss A Post!

    Sign up to receive updates and special announcements!

    Thank You For Subscribing to Common Sense Ethics!

    You have successfully joined my email list. 

    .
    Picture

    About Me:

    Thank you for your interest in Common Sense Ethics! I'm Leah, a librarian, editor and freelance writer with a background in history and philosophy.
    ​

    Most Popular Blog Posts:

    5 Things That You Need to be Happy According to Cicero

    Read These 5 Books for a Deeper Understanding of Politics

    Hope, Courage and Gratitude During Covid-19

    How the Left/Right Political Spectrum Deceives Us 
    ​
    Would You Risk Your Life For Philosophy?

    38 Life Lessons in 38 Years

    Why is Politics so Divisive?

    ​The Secret to Building a Close Family

    Why You Should Create Your Own Culture to Be Happier

    How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda

    ​The 10 Best Philosophy Books For Beginners

    The 13 Types of Modern Stoics...Which One Are You?

    4 Pieces of Stoic Wisdom for Dealing With Negative News Media

    How to be a Badass According to Cicero

    5 Ways to Avoid Being Manipulated and Dumbed Down by the Media

    Quick Guide: Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics in Modern Life

    The Secret to Happiness: Stoic Gratitude and the Art of Living

    What Everyone Needs to Know About Violence and Self Defense

    Download My Stoic Printables For Tough Days:

    Picture

    Watch Common Sense Ethics On YouTube:


    Support CSE:

    Picture
    Picture
    Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com


    Topics:

    All
    According To Cicero Series
    Alasdair Macintyre
    Albert Einstein
    Anger
    Antiauthoritarianism
    Applied Philosophy
    Aristotle
    Assertiveness
    Beauty
    Book Reviews
    Books And Reading
    Buddhism
    Carl Jung
    Cause And Effect
    Character Flaws
    Cicero
    Classical Education
    Cognitive Bias
    Consequence Based Ethics
    Cosmology
    Covert Manipulation
    Critical Thinking
    Culture
    Cynicism
    Death
    Descartes
    Destructive Behavior
    Economics
    Edmund Burke
    Education
    Egalitarianism
    Emotions
    Epictetus
    Ethical Objectivism
    Family
    Fortitude
    Francis-bacon
    Freedom
    Free Speech
    George-r-r-martin
    George-r-r-martin
    God
    Golden Rule
    Good Character
    Government
    Gratitude
    Happiness
    Heraclitus
    History
    Immanuel Kant
    Individual Rights
    Information Literacy
    Inner Life
    Integrity
    Introspection
    Intuition
    Iron Law Of Oligarchy
    Jaques Ellul
    John Locke
    John Sellars
    John Stuart Mill
    Jules Evans
    Karma
    Left-right Brain Balance
    Left-right Political Spectrum
    Liberal Democracy
    Literature
    Logic
    Marcus Aurelius
    Marriage
    Marx
    Mastering Emotion
    Media
    Metaethics
    Mindfullness
    Modern Stoicism
    Moral Relativism
    Moral Universalism
    Mortality
    Movies
    Musonius Rufus
    Musonius-rufus
    Natural Law
    Natural Rights
    Natural World
    Negative Freedom
    Negative-rights
    Neoplatonism
    Non Aggression
    Normative Ethics
    Normative-ethics
    Objectivismsubjectivism
    Oligarchy
    Parenting
    Personal Development
    Philosophy For Beginners
    Pierre Hadot
    Plato
    Politics
    Propaganda
    Psychology
    Pythagoreanism
    Relaxed Mental State
    Responsibility
    Rhetoric
    Right Vs. Wrong Actions
    Robert Nozik
    Roger Scruton
    Self Defense
    Self Discipline
    Seneca
    Simple Living
    Socrates
    Socratic Method
    Stoicism
    Stoic Meditation
    Stoic Virtues
    Television
    The Shadow
    Thomas Hobbes
    Traditionalism
    Trivium
    Utilitarianism
    Videos
    Violence
    Virtue Ethics
    War

    Archives:

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013


    ​Book of the Month: 

    Picture


    ​Personal Growth Resources:

    Picture
    Use this in-depth questionnaire to learn more about your faults and subconscious motivations.


    Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics In Modern Life:

    Picture


    ​Follow Common Sense Ethics on Pinterest:

    Picture


    ​Join the Stoic Parents Facebook Group:

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly