Common Sense Ethics
  • Blog
  • About
  • My Books
  • Parenting Resources
  • Personal Growth Resources
  • Book Summaries
  • Contact Me

Evil in the Hearts of Men: Pacifism and Ethics in Game of Thrones and A Song of Ice and Fire

4/3/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
HBO's acclaimed Game of Thrones is often regarded as being one of the best shows on television. In anticipation of the Season 4 premier this Sunday, I am focusing on the popular epic fantasy series which the show is based on, A Song of Ice and Fire, by George R. R. Martin.

​The books are known for portraying an exceptionally violent rendition of life in the Middle Ages, to which many people ascribe the famous Hobbesian maxim, “Life is nasty, brutish, and short.” What may not be readily apparent to both readers and TV show viewers, is that there is strong evidence suggesting that Martin is in fact actually trying to convey a non-aggressive or pacifist message, more consistent with his own conscientious beliefs, than a cynical or Hobbesian perspective.


In creative writing, the gold standard is “show, don't tell.” Martin does this so well and so subtly, that many people are not even aware of the novel's pacifist themes. In fact, many readers assume the opposite. Both the novel and the TV show have often been criticized for being too violent. There is a good deal of rage, bloodshed, war, cruelty, death, tragedy, rape, incest, profanity and sex. On account of this fact, it's no wonder that some derive a cynical or “everyone is evil” mindset from the books and show. However, Martin has stated that he wants to make A Song of Ice and Fire realistic like the Middle Ages and real life. Some people tend to mistake this realism for proof of the novel's amorality, but it is not actually amoral.

Ironically, you don't often come to higher order understanding about non-aggression or ethics by refusing to address the fact that people are capable of aggressive and unethical acts, and that there are consequences to such actions. (Before you continue reading, please note that this essay contains mild book 1-3 spoilers, and Season 1-4 TV show spoilers.)


Part of the genius of A Song of Ice and Fire, is that Martin writes using various character's points of view, and the reader does not have the aid of an omnipotent narrator to communicate the ultimate moral of the story. The story is Aristotelian in that Martin takes an indirect, rather than a direct view of morality. The characters express moral ambiguity colored by their personal point of view, much like people in the real world. Morality seems ambiguous, but to large extent it isn’t, when like the reader, you can see the bigger picture.

When asked about his novels, Martin states: “Like much fantasy, it's concerned with the battle of good versus evil, but where I think I differ from a lot of other fantasists is, in my view, the battle between good and evil is waged every day within the individual human heart.” In other words, the real evil in A Song of Ice and Fire isn't the Others or dragons, its in the hearts of so many in Westeros.


George R. R. Martin, Conscientious Objection, and Non-Aggression

George R. R. Martin was a conscientious objector to the Vietnam War. Though not a total pacifist, he states in this interesting clip that his goal with A Song of Ice and Fire, is to show the true cost of war. He acknowledges that the perception of war as something glorious is a problem. Martin especially shows his pacifism in his recent Westeros novella, Dangerous Women: “The Princess and The Queen, or, The Blacks and The Greens.”

Consider that the title of the 4th book in the Ice and Fire series, is A Feast for Crows. This overt reference to battlefield dead, is what the quest for the Iron Throne (a red-herring) has actually yielded; slaughter and chaos. The message here is pacifist. Aristocratic vendettas and war have ruined Westeros, decimating both the noble houses and the smallfolk alike. Catelyn Stark's point of view also frequently talks about how pointless war is.

During the War of the Five Kings, many people who submitted to their liege lord's authority by following their lord to war, are abused or slaughtered. This occurrence shows that a strong centralized authority is not sufficient to provide freedom and safety to the people; in fact, allegiance to a lord or king has actually brought about the opposite for many. Considering that Martin himself refused this kind of submission to authority, I think it safe to say that in addition to the human costs of war, two themes which the books also explore are the abuse of power, and the morality of dying in the name of a ruler.

Martin's views on violence may be similar to the conscious non-initiation position, also known as the non-aggression principle. It is a normative ethical position which condones self-defensive force, and simultaneously condemns the initiation of violence. Non-aggressionists generally believe that diplomatic problems should be solved without recourse to war.

Moral Choice, Mercy, and Honor

George R. R. Martin takes the Aristotelian view that most people struggle with moral choice and ambiguity, rather than a Hobbesian view that people are naturally bad. "All of us have the capacity for good and all of us have the capacity for evil; it's a question of the decisions we make… I like to paint in shades of gray and to try to reflect, even in a fantasy context, some of the complexities of real life,” Martin states.

Jon Snow is a character who struggles to make the right choices, but he generally does the merciful thing. When the wildling band of raiders that he is with order him to kill a defenseless old man, he chooses to flee rather than do so. In refusing to murder an unarmed man, he shows a strong sense of morality and mercy. By refusing to follow unethical orders, he puts himself in danger by exposing his enduring allegiance to the Night's Watch. Jon seems to believe that true chivalry is about protecting the weak.

When Jon's father is killed, and his brother Robb Stark declares war on Iron Throne, Jon discusses the difficult choice that lies ahead with Master Aemon and Lord Commander Mormont. Jon has sworn an oath to the Night's Watch. He can either keep his oath, or leave to fight for his family. Mormont advocates the chivalric code of keeping oaths and following orders, as being the honorable choice. Master Aemon asks Jon what his father, Ned Stark, would have done. Jon says, “he would do what is right.” For Jon, honor is about doing the right thing in accordance with a merciful chivalric code of ethics, even when the right thing is hard to do.


Revenge, Causality, and the Externalization of Evil

Most of the characters in A Song of Ice and Fire who are motivated by revenge come to a bad end. This is true of Oberyn Martel, Robert Baratheon, and Robb Stark. Robb Stark is fine with using war and violence to get what he wants; Northern independence and revenge for the death of his father. Robb is a sympathetic character, but he may actually be somewhat of an unethical character. By contrast, Doran Martel also grieves over the murder of his sister by the Lannister forces, but unlike Robb, or his brother Oberyn, he is extremely cautious about using war or violence. He prefers to use statecraft and non-violent means where possible to achieve his goals.

Yet another theme Martin explores is causality, and the unintended consequences of various actions. Theon Grayjoy makes a series of poor choices, including attacking Winterfell, which land him in jeopardy. "I skinned two miller's boys because I didn't want to look weak,” Theon says. His desire to look tough in front of his men, leads him to commit atrocities, and puts him in a position where he is eventually captured and tortured by Ramsay Snow.

It has been said that the road to hell paved with good intentions. Daenerys Targaryan is yet another character with no scruples about using violence and war to get what she wants. Though she seems to have noble motives, and she overthrows slave masters in various free cities, she is also responsible for creating chaos and unrest in the vacuum that she leaves behind after burning the slave masters alive using her dragons.

That the struggle for the Iron Throne is a red herring, becomes explicitly clear from perspective of Mirri Maz Duur. Daenerys and the Dothraki have killed and raped her people for an iron chair. For Mirri Maz Duur, there is a huge causal and ethical disconnect inherent in these actions. Daenerys decides to burn Mirri at the stake, and the reader begins to wonder if Daenerys ' character is actually a hero or a villain. The means that she uses to achieve her goals simply do not justify the ends.

Finally, Martin explores the externalization of evil, via the threat of the Others or White Walkers. A zealot like Melissandre, who adheres to a polarized world view where fire represents the only good, is a perfect example of a character ironically loosing the internal battle for good within her own heart. In her quest to save the world from the external evil represented by the Great Other, Melissandre is actually causing evil herself by burning people at the stake.


The Endgame of A Song of Ice and Fire

One unusual thing about A Song of Ice and Fire is that it is an unfinished series. Books 6 and 7 have yet to be published. The situation lends itself to speculation about the eventual conclusion by fans.

Is evil, or the imbalance within the hearts of those in Westeros, ultimately what is causing the imbalance in the seasons? Is man's evil bringing on the long night? Is that why the center of the supposed external evil threat is called the Heart of Winter?
Such a conclusion is what I would like to see personally, but even if that doesn't happen, many ethical themes have already been sufficiently explored in the novels.

Martin has stated that lesser fantasy always presents clichéd versions of magic, the all-good hero, or the evil villain. Not magic, but character is what allows Martin to explore the following themes:

Are people innately good or innately evil? What constitutes good and what constitutes evil? Is war or aggression justified? What happens if our good intentions produce unintended consequences? Why do rulers abuse power? Does a strong centralized authority protect or abuse people? What is honor? What is moral choice? Do the ends justify the means?

Ultimately, A Song of Ice and Fire, like all good literature, compels us to address these important questions.

~

*Credit posters on the Forum of Ice and Fire with some of the ideas in this post.

Related Posts:

What Everyone Needs To Know About Violence and Self-Defense


Breaking Bad's Secret Message



0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Don't Miss A Post!

    Sign up to receive updates and special announcements!

    Thank You For Subscribing to Common Sense Ethics!

    You have successfully joined my email list. 

    .
    Picture

    About Me:

    Thank you for your interest in Common Sense Ethics! I'm Leah, a librarian and freelance editor with a background in history and philosophy.
    ​

    Most Popular Blog Posts:

    3 Unpopular (But Likely Correct) Opinions According to Cicero

    Beauty in Philosophy, Ethics and Art: A Conversation with David Fideler

    5 Ways to Counterbalance an Ugly and Barren Cultural Landscape

    How Propaganda Makes us Psychologically Totalitarian

    5 Things That You Need to be Happy According to Cicero

    5 Wholesome Character Education Books to Read to Your Child

    Why is Politics so Divisive?

    9 Great Critical Thinking Books for Children and Teens

    Why You Should Create Your Own Culture to Be Happier

    How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda

    ​The 10 Best Philosophy Books For Beginners

    The 13 Types of Modern Stoics...Which One Are You?

    How to be a Badass According to Cicero

    Quick Guide: Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics in Modern Life

    Download My Stoic Printables For Tough Days:

    Picture

    Watch Common Sense Ethics On YouTube:


    Support CSE:

    Picture
    Picture
    Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com


    Topics:

    All
    According To Cicero Series
    Aesthetics
    Alasdair Macintyre
    Albert Einstein
    American Revolution
    Ancient Greece
    Ancient Rome
    Anger
    Antiauthoritarianism
    Applied Philosophy
    Aristotle
    Assertiveness
    Beauty
    Book Reviews
    Books And Reading
    Buddhism
    Carl Jung
    Cause And Effect
    Character Flaws
    Cicero
    Classical Education
    Cognitive Bias
    Consequence Based Ethics
    Consumerism
    Cosmology
    Covert Manipulation
    Critical Thinking
    Culture
    Cynicism
    Death
    Descartes
    Destructive Behavior
    Economics
    Edmund Burke
    Education
    Egalitarianism
    Emotions
    Epictetus
    Ethical Objectivism
    Family
    Fortitude
    Francis-bacon
    Freedom
    Freedom Of Speech
    Free Speech
    George-r-r-martin
    George-r-r-martin
    God
    Golden Rule
    Good Character
    Government
    Gratitude
    Happiness
    Heraclitus
    History
    Immanuel Kant
    Individual Rights
    Information Literacy
    Inner Life
    Integrity
    Introspection
    Intuition
    Iron Law Of Oligarchy
    Jaques Ellul
    John Locke
    John Sellars
    John Stuart Mill
    Jules Evans
    Karma
    Left-right Brain Balance
    Left-right Political Spectrum
    Liberal Democracy
    Literature
    Logic
    Marcus Aurelius
    Marriage
    Marx
    Mastering Emotion
    Media
    Metaethics
    Mindfullness
    Moderation/temperance
    Modern Stoicism
    Moral Relativism
    Moral Universalism
    Mortality
    Movies
    Musonius Rufus
    Musonius-rufus
    Natural Law
    Natural Rights
    Natural World
    Negative Freedom
    Negative-rights
    Neoplatonism
    Non Aggression
    Normative Ethics
    Normative-ethics
    Objectivismsubjectivism
    Oligarchy
    Parenting
    Personal Development
    Philosophy For Beginners
    Pierre Hadot
    Plato
    Politics
    Propaganda
    Psychology
    Pythagoreanism
    Relaxed Mental State
    Renaissance
    Responsibility
    Rhetoric
    Right Vs. Wrong Actions
    Robert Nozik
    Roger Scruton
    Self Defense
    Self Discipline
    Seneca
    Sexuality
    Simple Living
    Socrates
    Socratic Method
    Stoicism
    Stoic Meditation
    Stoic Virtues
    Television
    The Shadow
    Thomas Hobbes
    Traditionalism
    Trivium
    Utilitarianism
    Videos
    Violence
    Virtue Ethics
    War

    Archives:

    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013


    ​Book of the Month: Journal Like a Stoic by Brittany Polat

    Picture


    ​Personal Growth Resources:

    Picture
    Use this in-depth questionnaire to learn more about your faults and subconscious motivations.


    Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics In Modern Life:

    Picture


    ​Follow Common Sense Ethics on Pinterest:

    Picture


    ​Join the Stoic Parents Facebook Group:

    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.