Common Sense Ethics
  • Blog
  • About
  • My Books
  • Parenting Resources
  • Personal Growth Resources
  • Book Summaries
  • Contact Me

The Philosophy That Could Save Humanity

12/29/2018

4 Comments

 
Picture
Most of what we know about ethics is wrong, and unless we get our act together soon, humanity is doomed. That is, according to The Zombies (On Morality), a just released book by Josh Bachynski, which I've had the pleasure of reading, reviewing, and discussing on my YouTube Channel (see the video at the end of the post). Our lack of appropriate ethics is the basis of all of our problems. Essentially we are infected with a virus which sabotages every society that we try.
​​

The problem, in Josh's estimation, lies with people imposing what he calls "objective-prescriptive," moral beliefs on others, when doing so may be sub-optimal for them. If the essence of morality is goodness, then any sub-optimality may be immoral for the person imposed upon. His argument is about maximizing what is ideal for each person. Nothing matters but the maximal epitome of what's positive and ideal.

To be more precise, he calls his system inter subjective-predictive morality or ISPM for short. ISPM is about giving each person what is morally ideal for them based on what they want, based on fact, rather than offering generalizations about what is right for everyone or what everyone should do, even if it isn't evident. Provided they aren't hurting someone else, there is no self-evident justification from barring someone from their best end good or from living their most valuable life.

The Ethics of the Guest

Josh argues that what he calls, "The ethics of the dinner table," or the ethics of the guest, is ideal. For example, we provide Kosher options for a Jewish friend, or vegetarian options for someone who doesn't eat meat. ISPM is a "common sense ethic," in that we all do it naturally unless some strongly held objective-prescriptive belief of ours gets in the way. Then we tend to default to objective-prescriptive morality, something taking the form of "everyone should do x," or "x is wrong," even if x is actually ideal for someone based on what they say, based on fact.

This type of logic, which imposes moral beliefs on others in an arbitrary and less than ideal way, is what he calls the virus. Josh posits that something called the application fallacy hinders all objective moral propositions because they fail to convincingly establish to whom moral rules apply. He argues that the statement "x is wrong," is in fact not a complete argument. We must establish who x is wrong for. If we say x is wrong for everyone, it is often not self-evident that it is wrong for everyone.

Interestingly, Josh's argument is just as much attack on subjective moral theories like post-modernism as it is on objective moral theories like virtue ethics and deontological ethics. Subjectivists tend to default to objective-prescriptive morality in practice in an extremely virulent way, even while declaring that there are no moral truths. ISPM differs from both in that it describes only, but does not dictate or impose. It is about seeking the ideal and not hurting people of forcing things on them.


My Stoic readers may be challenged, as I initially was, by the fact that ISPM tends to conflict with virtue ethics (which assumes certain virtues are optimal for everyone). However, I think it is possible to be a moral objectivist without imposing your morality on others in practice.

In dealing with others, Josh argues that we should not go beyond the mere annoyance of individuals via our behavior, as doing so is not maximally good. However if their intrinsicity involves directly hurting others, (they are a bully, a rapist, or a murderer), then we would be completely justified, in mooting that immediately.

When we make moral decisions and not all the variables are known, a level of risk of hurting someone is involved. Therefore having patience and mulling it over as long as is sufficiently maximally good, increases the chances of our mitigating these kinds of risks. 


Is The Zombies a Good Read?

Overall I think Josh is onto something quite important in The Zombies, and I think largely his argument succeeds. 

My main criticism of the book are the occasional political asides which seems to undercut the main argument that individuals should not impose morals on others, yet it may be okay for the state to do so. I think these contradictory asides are included to appeal to his target audience - probably left-leaning thinkers - although in my estimation Zombies naturally appeals to anyone who is anti-authoritarian, which is by no means limited to the left. Josh makes it quite clear (and I agree) that both the left and the right get a lot wrong in terms of trying to force their beliefs onto others.

A necessary corollary of his argument is that some kind of non-impositional minarchist government would be ideal, since when implemented, ISPM really necessitates small government, even direct democracy, in order to avoid violating each person's intrinsicity in the way Utilitarianism does (as many government actions are necessarily harmful to some.) I asked Josh about that, and much more, in our interesting YouTube chat (below), so please check it out for further details on the book.

Josh has made the book free and available to everyone as a digital download, even though it represents more than a decade's worth of work. Visit thezombiesbook.com to read it. 

​
4 Comments
JOHN N PAVLOVITS link
1/9/2019 10:51:26 am

If morality is relative then there are no standards. Without standards of right and wrong there is no logical argument against immorality.

If immoral behavior is generally excepted then all hell breaks loose.

Reply
Leah
1/9/2019 05:59:30 pm

Hi John,

I think the idea is that the moral standard is to treat someone how they say they want to be treated. It's a complex argument that Josh makes, I suggest warching the video or reading the book. I'm more of a moral objectivist myself, but this isn't the typical subjectist argument either.

Reply
Winton link
2/16/2019 09:36:28 pm

I started reading Josh’s book a few weeks ago and just finished yesterday. Even then, I skimmed quite a lot. It looks to me as though it should be possible for him to present his argument in less than 100 pages. I think he will have more influence if he does that at some stage.
I enjoyed watching your interview of Josh.
I agree with your point that his view is quite close to virtue ethics. There is a conceptual difference between the view that it is good for humans to flourish because they have potential to do so and the view that flourishing is good because it feels good. But I don’t think that makes much practical difference to behaviour. We don’t like cognitive dissonance, so our cognitions about what we value tend to be aligned with our feelings about what we value.
My main point of disagreement with Josh concerns his treatment of norms of behaviour. I think he puts too much weight on power relations in the evolution of norms of market behaviour. In my view his analysis of the ethics of breaking contracts fails in terms of his ISPM ethics. A person who fails to meet reasonable expectations of partners to a contract is likely to be judged to be untrustworthy and to suffer adverse consequences. Josh’s view on this seems to me to conflict with his advocacy of prudent behaviour in other contexts.
Thanks for drawing attention to Josh’s view. I think his philosophy deserves serious consideration.

Reply
Leah
2/17/2019 12:21:39 pm

Thanks Winton, I'll let Josh know about your comments!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Don't Miss A Post!

    Sign up to receive updates and special announcements!

    Thank You For Subscribing to Common Sense Ethics!

    You have successfully joined my email list. 

    .
    Picture

    About Me:

    Thank you for your interest in Common Sense Ethics! I'm Leah, a librarian and freelance editor with a background in history and philosophy.
    ​

    Most Popular Blog Posts:

    3 Unpopular (But Likely Correct) Opinions According to Cicero

    Beauty in Philosophy, Ethics and Art: A Conversation with David Fideler

    5 Ways to Counterbalance an Ugly and Barren Cultural Landscape

    How Propaganda Makes us Psychologically Totalitarian

    5 Things That You Need to be Happy According to Cicero

    5 Wholesome Character Education Books to Read to Your Child

    Why is Politics so Divisive?

    9 Great Critical Thinking Books for Children and Teens

    Why You Should Create Your Own Culture to Be Happier

    How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda

    ​The 10 Best Philosophy Books For Beginners

    The 13 Types of Modern Stoics...Which One Are You?

    How to be a Badass According to Cicero

    Quick Guide: Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics in Modern Life

    Download My Stoic Printables For Tough Days:

    Picture

    Watch Common Sense Ethics On YouTube:


    Support CSE:

    Picture
    Picture
    Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com


    Topics:

    All
    According To Cicero Series
    Aesthetics
    Alasdair Macintyre
    Albert Einstein
    American Revolution
    Ancient Greece
    Ancient Rome
    Anger
    Antiauthoritarianism
    Applied Philosophy
    Aristotle
    Assertiveness
    Beauty
    Book Reviews
    Books And Reading
    Buddhism
    Carl Jung
    Cause And Effect
    Character Flaws
    Cicero
    Classical Education
    Cognitive Bias
    Consequence Based Ethics
    Consumerism
    Cosmology
    Covert Manipulation
    Critical Thinking
    Culture
    Cynicism
    Death
    Descartes
    Destructive Behavior
    Economics
    Edmund Burke
    Education
    Egalitarianism
    Emotions
    Epictetus
    Ethical Objectivism
    Family
    Fortitude
    Francis-bacon
    Freedom
    Freedom Of Speech
    Free Speech
    George-r-r-martin
    George-r-r-martin
    God
    Golden Rule
    Good Character
    Government
    Gratitude
    Happiness
    Heraclitus
    History
    Immanuel Kant
    Individual Rights
    Information Literacy
    Inner Life
    Integrity
    Introspection
    Intuition
    Iron Law Of Oligarchy
    Jaques Ellul
    John Locke
    John Sellars
    John Stuart Mill
    Jules Evans
    Karma
    Left-right Brain Balance
    Left-right Political Spectrum
    Liberal Democracy
    Literature
    Logic
    Marcus Aurelius
    Marriage
    Marx
    Mastering Emotion
    Media
    Metaethics
    Mindfullness
    Moderation/temperance
    Modern Stoicism
    Moral Relativism
    Moral Universalism
    Mortality
    Movies
    Musonius Rufus
    Musonius-rufus
    Natural Law
    Natural Rights
    Natural World
    Negative Freedom
    Negative-rights
    Neoplatonism
    Non Aggression
    Normative Ethics
    Normative-ethics
    Objectivismsubjectivism
    Oligarchy
    Parenting
    Personal Development
    Philosophy For Beginners
    Pierre Hadot
    Plato
    Politics
    Propaganda
    Psychology
    Pythagoreanism
    Relaxed Mental State
    Renaissance
    Responsibility
    Rhetoric
    Right Vs. Wrong Actions
    Robert Nozik
    Roger Scruton
    Self Defense
    Self Discipline
    Seneca
    Sexuality
    Simple Living
    Socrates
    Socratic Method
    Stoicism
    Stoic Meditation
    Stoic Virtues
    Television
    The Shadow
    Thomas Hobbes
    Traditionalism
    Trivium
    Utilitarianism
    Videos
    Violence
    Virtue Ethics
    War

    Archives:

    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013


    ​Book of the Month: Journal Like a Stoic by Brittany Polat

    Picture


    ​Personal Growth Resources:

    Picture
    Use this in-depth questionnaire to learn more about your faults and subconscious motivations.


    Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics In Modern Life:

    Picture


    ​Follow Common Sense Ethics on Pinterest:

    Picture


    ​Join the Stoic Parents Facebook Group:

    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.