Common Sense Ethics
Follow Common Sense Ethics:
  • Blog
  • About
  • Books & Book Reviews
  • Parenting Resources
  • Personal Growth Resources
  • Contact Me

Are You a Disordered Philosopher?

3/18/2017

13 Comments

 
Picture
Would you really want to take advice from an extremist? How about someone who doesn't care about virtue? If you admire Carl Marx, Ayn Rand, and other disordered philosophers, this is exactly what you are doing. 

The notion of disordered philosophy as argued by Terrance Hoyt is quite relevant at present. Disordered philosophies have polarized public discourse to the point where political and economic policy issues are now considered strictly moral: "Look for any policies talked about with intense moral language, that allow no compromise, and are all-or-nothing in their implementation," Hoyt states.


Marx and Rand represent opposite ends of the political spectrum and their respective philosophies have had untold influence. Both produced an extremist brand of thought based on a "morally pure," vision of society. And neither fits the description of a "good man," (or woman in Rand's case) based on Aristotle's criteria of inward focus on virtue. Disordered philosophers are not truly concerned about virtue or the good; they are essentially egoistic. 

More disturbingly, philosophical personality types (I'm including myself here) seem to be at higher risk of becoming disordered philosophers as evidenced by a new book, When Reason Goes on Holiday. As thoughtful people concerned about virtue, what can we do to avoid falling victim to disordered philosophy? How can we identify and counter disordered philosophies which lead to increasing polarization and destabilization?


What is Disordered Philosophy?

Hoyt has based his definition of disordered philosophy off of the work of philosopher Eric Voegelin. Voegelin argued that both sides of the political spectrum (the so-called left and right) are now so ideological that their reactions to each other have become increasingly “extreme.”

Hoyt expands on this, defining a disordered philosopher as essentially egositic, who advances a kind of extremism motivated by a morally pure vision of society at any cost to stability (as opposed to maximizing the probability that most citizens are able to get their basic needs met in peace and stability.) Hoyt also argues that disordered philosophers conflate the economic and/or political with the strictly moral (the pursuit of virtue).  


In my last post, I argued that public policy is essentially utilitarian, and therefore, it does no good getting angry with people over their political views as though these have anything to do with true morality - which should be based on one's personal actions. My argument dovetails nicely with Hoyt's insistence that those influenced by disordered philosophy - unfortunately many people today - tend to confuse the political and economic with the strictly moral.

While I'm not sure that I fully accept Hoyt's idea that political and economic policy issues have no moral component (if that is even what Hoyt is arguing since his book is still forthcoming), I certainly agree with the idea that economic and political matters are not strictly moral, and certainly not from a virtue ethics perspective. We have politicized virtue to the point that many people today conflate their political and economic views with their moral views.

"When activism is motivated by any felt moral absolute; any idea of perfection, it leads to an increase in political instability...Whether from the left or right, neither force nor freedom will make up for the absence of a philosophically robust notion of virtue in society," Hoyt states.


As a corollary, he also argues that the Enlightenment's focus on the strictly rational had the effect of marginalizing those who truly care about virtue from public discourse. Marx's thought in particular may have been a reaction (albeit a disordered one) to the cold rationalism of the Enlightenment:

"The spirit of the Enlightenment has created a culture which at best ignores and at worst denigrates serious treatment of the sources of deep morality and goodness. This dismissal of virtue has contributed to a misplaced moral fanaticism that has recently begun to infect public policy."


The Four Personality Types and The Disordered Philosopher

Hoyt's work on the four personality types is intriguing. His types include: the philosopher, the average person, the strong man, and the disordered philosopher. Hoyt argues that only .01 percent of the population are philosophers. I don't know what basis he used to compile these numbers, but would like to think there are more. If he is correct, I can never hope for a larger readership for the blog! 

According to Hoyt, only the philosopher type is concerned about virtue; the other types are assumed to be egoistic by default. Hoyt argues that the philosopher type can become a disordered philosopher when economic and political ideals are treated as strictly moral if not spiritual. Hoyt's forthcoming book:

"Seeks to shed light on the philosophical sources of the morally indignant activism many public intellectuals have subscribed to in the late 20th and early 21st century. The resurgence of a Puritanical spirit in our politics is a threat to the stability of the United States, for it prevents policy making for the practical good of the citizen."

Hoyt places the blame partly on education, stating: 

How else are we to interpret the odd treatment of the political-economic as a realm to which we are supposed to apply intense moral passion? Both on the left as well as on the right, public intellectuals for the most part focus exclusively on economic relations as the sole domain in which morality is and should be cultivated. Some treat low tax rates and the legalization of the ability to get rich at any cost as the new moral absolute, while others fetishize economic equality. When our public philosophy teaches the young that they should not care about public virtue or goodness but only a self-interest grounded in economics, we ought not be surprised when those with a sincere care for the common good confusedly seek meaning and virtue in the realm of political-economy.

Further evidence of the disordered philosopher phenomenon is detailed in a new book, When Reason Goes on Holiday by Neven Sasardic, which focuses on what happened when many modern philosophers wandered down from the ivory tower to pursue politics:

"Sesardic devotes a chapter to Gerald Cohen, the Oxford philosophy professor...[who took an] evil position during the Hungarian Uprising of 1956. The Hungarian theme continues through a chapter on Imre Lakatos, the philosopher of mathematics and science who helped purge non-communist faculty in Hungarian schools and planned the suicide of a young woman named Eva Izsak in 1944, in order to divert attention away from his communist cell."
​
Marx and Rand are further examples of disordered philosophers - essentially fanatical and egoistic in their treatment of economics - which Hoyt argues is corrosive to stability. Rand treats unlimited economic freedom as a strictly moral ideal. Marx does the same, except that he advances strict economic equality as a deep moral value. Not only did their respective philosophies revolve around a "morally pure," vision of society at any cost, but they both fail to live up to Aristotle's criteria for the "good man," i. e. one who is inwardly focused on becoming virtuous. 

A disordered philosopher is never focused on trying to improve himself, but rather driven by the need to make society morally pure. From the perspective that a philosophy is something that ought to be lived, that ought to be transformative, and that compels us to pursue virtue, it should give us pause when a philosopher is not concerned with becoming a better person. Marx in particular seems to fail to live up to the Aristotelian vision. 


How to Avoid Becoming a Disordered Philosopher

Given that philosopher types are in danger of becoming disordered, what can we do to avoid falling victim to disordered philosophy? My answer is twofold. First, we ought to be primarily inwardly focused on becoming better people. And second, we ought to be reasonable people who are unswayed by fanaticism. 

​
Socrates expected each person to be excellent, rational, and to care for their internal disposition. George Friedmann’s La Puissance de la Sagesse (The Power of Wisdom) expands on the necessity of a getting rid of egotism if we are to be involved in politics: 

Try to get rid of your passions, vanities, and the itch for talk about your own name, which sometimes burns you like a chronic disease. Avoid backbiting. Get rid of pity and hatred. Love all free human beings. Become eternal by transcending yourself.
This work on yourself is necessary; this ambition justified. Lots of people let themselves be wholly absorbed by militant politics and the preparation for social revolution. Rare, much more rare, are they who, in order to prepare for the revolution, are willing to make themselves worthy of it.


In other words, the revolution inside - one focused on virtue - is more important than political revolution. We become disordered when we fixate on the external conditions of life while neglecting what is going on inside of us. 


Furthermore, we must be reasonable people. As I have written in a previous post, being reasonable is one way to avoid being taken by propaganda, and I would also argue, by disordered philosophy. A reasonable person is never an extremist, remaining both open minded and rational. Jaques Ellul held that becoming a reasonable person is the proper end goal of social and philosophical development:

A reasonable person recognizes the limits and uncertainty of sources of information and shows a certain intellectual humility, being ready to cede ground to others in the light of additional facts or better judgements.


​We are less disordered when we continually focus on becoming virtuous as well as expanding our capabilities for self-examination and good judgement. 

~

You May Also Like:
5 Insightful Ways to Change Your Character Flaws 
​The Revolution Inside

​How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda
13 Comments
Winton link
3/18/2017 11:38:33 pm

Hi Leah,
This is very interesting.

I might be borderline disordered according to Hoyt's definition. I hold self-direction to be integral to human flourishing, and freedom to be the condition in which the flourishing of each individual can occur to the maximum extent without impinging on the flourishing of others.

But I reluctantly accept that at present human flourishing also requires the existence of government which restricts freedom by imposing tax to fund defence and justice, help the poor etc. Actually Rand was not an anarchist, so she can't have held that the freedom is all-important.

I might need to read more of Hoyt to understand what he is getting at.

Reply
Leah
3/19/2017 05:09:24 am

Yes, I'd really like your opinion on his work actually. My opinion is that he is advocating for a kind of classical liberalism that has been lost in the ideological struggle between extreme left and right, but perhaps I am misrepresenting it.

Marx wasn't an anarchist either, it should be noted. The problem with the two-bit them is that they seem to feel that only economic ends are conducive to virtue. I too reluctantly accept government as necessary until people are ethical enough to govern themselves.

His new book is specifically an attack on free-market ideology and libertarianism. He claims that extreme free market ideology constitutes the use of force. Maybe you could make a case for that with Rand, specifically because she was not anarchist, but Noziks philosophy revolves around the nonagression principle to avoid breviary of force. I'd be interested in reading the book when it comes out.

I doubt you are a disordered philosopher because you are obviously concerned with virtue and becoming a better person yourself.

Reply
Leah
3/19/2017 05:19:21 am

Sorry about the typos - auto-correct on my phone.

I'm really interested in reading Eric Voegelin more that Hoyt. Seems so interesting.

Reply
Winton link
3/19/2017 12:54:25 pm

I have just read this short article by Hoyt. http://www.practicalphilosophy.net/?p=2212.
I not sure about his views on Rand and Mises, but I am sure he misrepresents Hayek's view on provision of a social welfare safety net.

Reply
Leah
3/19/2017 04:19:12 pm

I would suggest that we comment on his blog but as far as I know he doesn't respond. Maybe we should comment anyway. I was thinking of emailing him to call attention to this post since it focuses on his thought.

Reply
Winton link
3/20/2017 09:57:30 pm

I will think about leaving comments on his blog.
There is an affinity between some of the stuff he writes and the stuff I have written about the characteristics of a good society. See: http://wintonbates.blogspot.com.au/2009/10/what-are-characteristics-of-good.html
What I am saying is that people should be able to leave aside the differences in their personal values and have a discussion about how they can live in peace, with widespread opportunity and a degree of security. If that discussion proceeds as I anticipate then people embrace personal freedom because it allows them to live in peace, they embrace economic freedom because it provides widespread opportunity and they endorse limited restrictions on freedom to provide security e.g. national defence, social safety net. But all those propositions are open to debate.

Reply
Leah
3/21/2017 04:00:39 pm

Yes I think I read that post of yours before. I also noticed the similarities in your respective work. I completely agree with what you are saying.

Reply
Winton link
3/21/2017 02:06:29 am

I tried to leave a comment on Terrance's blog, along the lines of the above comments, but it didn't appear. I guess he has to approve.

Reply
Leah
3/21/2017 03:43:38 pm

I tried commenting a while back and I'm not sure what happened either, if it just went off in the ether. Thanks for doing that. I'll reply if I decide to email him.

Reply
Anitra link
3/21/2017 12:57:33 pm

Leah,
Really interesting post. It does seem counterintuitive to purport to fix the world without necessarily thinking it's important to pursue being a good person oneself. I like this ongoing theme in your writings. There is a piece in the new Atlantic arguing that the decline of religious participation has increased polarization and hostility in American politics. (I haven't read it yet but thought you might be interested.) It's almost as if when there is no logical outlet, such as religion or philosophical pursuits, for people's innate (I hope?) craving for virtue, it comes out in unnatural ways.

I recently just came across Friedmann's name while reading Pierre Hadot's Philosophy as a Way of Life. Have you been able to find Friedmann's work in English? He sounds like he'd be worth checking out.

Reply
Leah
3/21/2017 03:55:35 pm

Thanks! My first thought when I read your comment is that Christianity stresses reconciliation and loving one's neighbor (even if one's neighbor disagrees). I'll have to check out that article.

No I have not read Friedmann and it doesn't seem like many of his writings are available in English. Quite ironically he was a Marxist! But based on his quotations that I am familiar with, and introspective one at least.

Reply
Michael link
5/27/2022 07:56:05 am

Nice article! Thanks for sharing this informative post. Keep posting!

Reply
Leah
5/29/2022 03:31:12 am

Thank you for commenting!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Growing in Goodness

    Welcome! If you like what you see here please subscribe:

    Don't Miss A Post!

    Sign up to receive updates and special announcements!

    Thank You For Subscribing to Common Sense Ethics!

    You have successfully joined my email list. 

    .
    Picture

    About Me:

    Thank you for your interest in Common Sense Ethics! I'm Leah, a librarian, editor and freelance writer with a background in history and philosophy.
    ​

    Most Popular Blog Posts:

    5 Things That You Need to be Happy According to Cicero

    Read These 5 Books for a Deeper Understanding of Politics

    Hope, Courage and Gratitude During Covid-19

    How the Left/Right Political Spectrum Deceives Us 
    ​
    Would You Risk Your Life For Philosophy?

    38 Life Lessons in 38 Years

    Why is Politics so Divisive?

    ​The Secret to Building a Close Family

    Why You Should Create Your Own Culture to Be Happier

    How to Make Yourself Immune to Propaganda

    ​The 10 Best Philosophy Books For Beginners

    The 13 Types of Modern Stoics...Which One Are You?

    4 Pieces of Stoic Wisdom for Dealing With Negative News Media

    How to be a Badass According to Cicero

    5 Ways to Avoid Being Manipulated and Dumbed Down by the Media

    Quick Guide: Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics in Modern Life

    The Secret to Happiness: Stoic Gratitude and the Art of Living

    What Everyone Needs to Know About Violence and Self Defense

    Download My Stoic Printables For Tough Days:

    Picture

    Watch Common Sense Ethics On YouTube:


    Support CSE:

    Picture
    Picture
    Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com


    Topics:

    All
    According To Cicero Series
    Alasdair Macintyre
    Albert Einstein
    Anger
    Antiauthoritarianism
    Applied Philosophy
    Aristotle
    Assertiveness
    Beauty
    Book Reviews
    Books And Reading
    Buddhism
    Carl Jung
    Cause And Effect
    Character Flaws
    Cicero
    Classical Education
    Cognitive Bias
    Consequence Based Ethics
    Cosmology
    Covert Manipulation
    Critical Thinking
    Culture
    Cynicism
    Death
    Descartes
    Destructive Behavior
    Economics
    Edmund Burke
    Education
    Egalitarianism
    Emotions
    Epictetus
    Ethical Objectivism
    Family
    Fortitude
    Francis-bacon
    Freedom
    Free Speech
    George-r-r-martin
    George-r-r-martin
    God
    Golden Rule
    Good Character
    Government
    Gratitude
    Happiness
    Heraclitus
    History
    Immanuel Kant
    Individual Rights
    Information Literacy
    Inner Life
    Integrity
    Introspection
    Intuition
    Iron Law Of Oligarchy
    Jaques Ellul
    John Locke
    John Sellars
    John Stuart Mill
    Jules Evans
    Karma
    Left-right Brain Balance
    Left-right Political Spectrum
    Liberal Democracy
    Literature
    Logic
    Marcus Aurelius
    Marriage
    Marx
    Mastering Emotion
    Media
    Metaethics
    Mindfullness
    Modern Stoicism
    Moral Relativism
    Moral Universalism
    Mortality
    Movies
    Musonius Rufus
    Musonius-rufus
    Natural Law
    Natural Rights
    Natural World
    Negative Freedom
    Negative-rights
    Neoplatonism
    Non Aggression
    Normative Ethics
    Normative-ethics
    Objectivismsubjectivism
    Oligarchy
    Parenting
    Personal Development
    Philosophy For Beginners
    Pierre Hadot
    Plato
    Politics
    Propaganda
    Psychology
    Pythagoreanism
    Relaxed Mental State
    Responsibility
    Rhetoric
    Right Vs. Wrong Actions
    Robert Nozik
    Roger Scruton
    Self Defense
    Self Discipline
    Seneca
    Simple Living
    Socrates
    Socratic Method
    Stoicism
    Stoic Meditation
    Stoic Virtues
    Television
    The Shadow
    Thomas Hobbes
    Traditionalism
    Trivium
    Utilitarianism
    Videos
    Violence
    Virtue Ethics
    War

    Archives:

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013


    ​Book of the Month: 

    Picture


    ​Personal Growth Resources:

    Picture
    Use this in-depth questionnaire to learn more about your faults and subconscious motivations.


    Understanding and Applying Stoic Ethics In Modern Life:

    Picture


    ​Follow Common Sense Ethics on Pinterest:

    Picture


    ​Join the Stoic Parents Facebook Group:

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly